partial plaint cannot be rejected case law pakistan - An Overview
partial plaint cannot be rejected case law pakistan - An Overview
Blog Article
9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender and also the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Small fees implement.
As the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed for the disposal of the instant petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as well as private respondents and will take care of many of the components of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a possibility of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents of your boy or Woman usually do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they can do if they're able to Slice off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by law.
ten. Without touching the merits on the case from the issue of once-a-year increases within the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, this sort of annual increase, if permissible from the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment being made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
Summaries provide an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and insurance policies geared toward safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair for the offender as well as Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair click here trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners could search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more